Je crois que ces millionnaires ont aussi un probleme de QI.
Plus ils montrent qu'ils ont des sous, plus ils depensent pour chercher leur femmes de reves, plus ils ne trouvent que des filles interessees par leurs fortunes.
Un millionnaire intelligent se deguisera en clochard pour chercher la meilleure femme..lol
Ces millionaires n'ont pas un problème de QI mais de formation.
Ils ont, pour beaucoup, amasser leur fortune sur leur réseau, leur chance, leur coup bas, et moi souvent sur leur savoir faire financier et leur travail.
Bref, tout investisseur vous dira qu'investire une somme inconsidérer dans une femme est une imbécilité de débutant. Ca me rappelle ce poste sur Craglist en réponse à une femme cherchant un partenaire gagnant un minimum de 500,000USD/year. bonne lecture ;-) et désolé pour l'anglais, pas le temps de traduire..
I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully
about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.
Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your
bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here's how I
see it.
Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a
crappy business deal. Here's why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you
suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring
my money. Fine, simple. But here's the rub, your looks will fade and my
money will likely continue into perpetuity...in fact, it is very likely
that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won't
be getting any more beautiful!
So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning
asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation
accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will likely stay pretty
hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in
earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!
So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy
and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense
to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease. In case
you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were
to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's
as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.
Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So,
I wonder why a girl as "articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful"
as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to
believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K
hasn't found you, if not only for a tryout.
By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then
we wouldn't need to have this difficult conversation.
With all that said, I must say you're going about it the right way.
Classic "pump and dump."
I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of
lease, let me know.
(Desole Teran mais la tentation etait trop forte)
